I’ve only been finding Lepocinclis hispidula in the Simmelried since 2019. Since then I find the species there regularly. Before that, I have no records and Lepocinclis hispidula is not present in my other sampling sites either.
Â
The species was originally described as Phacus hispidulus (Lemmermann, 1910). In 2012, Phacus hispidulus was then transferred to the genus Lepocinclis by Bennet & Triemer on the basis of genetic analyses, together with some other Phacus species (e.g. Phacus horridus, s. “Synonyms” above).
Â
Lepocinclis hispidula is easily recognized by its longitudinal rows of short spines on the pellicle (s. fig. 1 a-c). These have an almost square and rectangular base (s. fig. 4). In addition, the species has a conically shaped apex from which the flagellum originates. Many disc-shaped chloroplasts can be seen in the cell (s. fig. 1 b). Two large paramylon grains are said to be present, but I was unable to detect them. The cell wall of my specimens was either colorless or slightly yellow-brown in color. In my population I also found specimens with only a few rows of rudimentary spines (s. fig. 2 a-c). It is possible that these are daughter cells after a division has taken place.
Fig. 1 a-c:Lepocinclis hispidula. L = 40 µm. Different focal planes of a freely swimming specimen. Note the cone-shaped apex (CA) where the flagellum (F) emerge. Chl = disc-shaped chloroplasts. Obj. 100 X.
Fig. 2 a-c:Lepocinclis hispidula. L = 38 µm. Different focal planes of a specimen with only few rows of rudimentary spines (arrows). CV = contractile vacuole, Nu = nucleus, RE = reservoir. Obj. 100 X.
Fig. 3 a-c:Lepocinclis hispidula. L = 46 µm. A third, freely swimming specimen. Obj. 100 X.
Fig. 4:Lepocinclis hispidula. L = 45 µm. A slightly squashed specimen with focal plane on the almost squared base of short spines. Obj. 100 X.